Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T13:34:08.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conodonts from the Upper Olentangy Shale (Upper Devonian, central Ohio) and stratigraphy across the Frasnian-Famennian Boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

D. Jeffrey Over  and
Meredith K. Rhodes
D. Jeffrey Over
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, State University of New York at Geneseo, Geneseo, New York, 14454,
Meredith K. Rhodes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Upper Olentangy Shale of Ohio, a green pyritic shale interbedded with thin dark gray shale beds, disconformably overlies the lithologically similar Middle Devonian Lower Olentangy Shale. The muds were deposited in a quiet offshore environment on the distal margin of the Appalachian Basin during the Late Frasnian through Early Famennian. The Upper Olentangy Shale contains abundant and diverse conodonts of MN Zone 13 and the Middle triangularis Zone. The Frasnian-Famennian boundary is 4-8 cm below the base of the Huron Shale at the Olentangy Shale type section in Delaware, Ohio. The boundary interval is a green shale containing a mixed highest Frasnian (e.g., Palmatolepis bogartensis, P. linguiformis) and lowest Famennian (e.g., P. delicatula, P. subperlobata, P. triangularis) conodont fauna. An ash horizon, pyritic bed, finely laminated dark shale, and a thin green-blue shale comprise the upper 3 cm of the Olentangy, and contain a conodont fauna indicative of the Middle triangularis Zone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , January 2000 , pp. 101 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, R. S. 1925. Classification and stratigraphic use of the conodonts. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 36:218–220.Google Scholar
Becker, R. T., and House, M. R. 1994. Kellwasser events and goniatite successions in the Devonian of the Montagne Noire with comments on possible causation. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 169:45–77.Google Scholar
Boogaard, M., van den. 1983. Conodont fauans from Portugal and southwestern Spain, Pt. 7, A Frasnian conodont fauna near the Estação de Cabrela (Portugal). Scripta Geologica, 69:1–18.Google Scholar
Boogaard, M., van den., and Kuhry, B. 1979. Statistical reconstruction of the Palmatolepis apparatuses (Late Devonian, conodontophorids) at the generic, subgeneric, and specific level: Scripta Geologica, 49, 57 p.Google Scholar
Branson, E. R. 1934. Conodonts from the Hannibal Formation of Missouri. University of Missouri Studies, 8:301–334 [1933].Google Scholar
Branson, E. R., and Mehl, M. G. 1934. Conodonts from the Grassy Creek shale of Missouri. University of Missouri Studies, 8:171–259 [1933].Google Scholar
Branson, E. R., and Mehl, M. G. 1938. Conodonts from the lower Mississippian of Missouri. University of Missouri Studies, 13:128–148.Google Scholar
Bultynck, P., and Martin, V. 1995. Assessment of an old stratotype: the Frasnian-Famennian boundary at Senzeilles, southern Beligium. Bulletin de L'Institut Royal Des Sciences Naturelles de Beligique, 65:5–34.Google Scholar
Claeys, P., Kyte, F. T., Herbosch, A., and Casier, J.-G. 1996. Geochemistry of the Frasnian-Famennian boundary in Belgium: mass extinction, anoxic oceans, and microtektite layers, but not much iridium? Geological Society of America Special Paper 307, p. 491–504.Google Scholar
Dzik, J. 1976. Remarks on the evolution of Ordovician conodonts. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 21:395–455.Google Scholar
Gable, K. M. 1973. Conodonts and stratigraphy of the Olentangy Shale (Middle and Upper Devonian), central and south-central Ohio. Unpublished Masters thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, 90 p.Google Scholar
Han, Y.-J. 1987. Study on Upper Devonian Frasnian/Famennian boundary in Maanshan, Zhongping, Xianzhou, Guangxi. Bulletin Chinese Academy of Science, 17:171–194.Google Scholar
Hass, W. H. 1959. Conodonts from the Chapel Limestone of Texas, p. 365–399. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 294-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1879. On conodonts from the Chazy and Cincinnati group of the Cambro-Silurian and from the Hamilton and Genesee shale divisions of the Devonian in Canada and the United States. Geological Society of London Quarterly Journal, 35:351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, K. V. 1960. Devonian-Mississippian Shale Sequence in Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey Information Circular 27, 153 p.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1968. Redescription of Upper Devonian conodont genera and species proposed by Ulrich and Bassler in 1926. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 578, 55 p.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1970. Revised descriptions of some Late Devonian polygnathid conodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 44:1029–1040.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1971. Sequence within the conodont genus Polygnathus in the New York lower Middle Devonian. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 5:59–79.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1975. Icriodus, p. 69–70, 109-111. In Ziegler, W. (ed.), Catalogue of Conodonts II. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1989. The Montagne Noire Frasnian (Upper Devonian) conodont successions, p. 449–468. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, Volume 3. [imprint 1988]Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1990. Frasnian species of the Late Devonian conodont genus Ancyrognathus . Journal of Paleontology, 64:998–1025.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W. 1997. Graphic correlation of Frasnian (Upper Devonian) sequences in Montagne Noire, France, and western Canada, p. 113–129. In Klapper, G., Murphy, M. A., and Talent, J. A. (eds.), Paleozoic Sequence Stratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Biogeography: Studies in Honor of J. Granville (“Jess”) Johnson. Geological Society of America Special Paper 321.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W., and Foster, C. T. Jr. 1993. Shape analysis of Frasnian species of the Late Devonian conodonts Genus Palmatolepis: The Paleontological Society, Memoir 32:1–35.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W., and Lane, H. R. 1985. Upper Devonian (Frasnian) conodonts of the Polygnathus biofacies N.W.T.: Canada: Journal of Paleontology, 59:904–951.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W., Kirchgasser, W. T., and Baesemann, J. F. 1995. Graphic Correlation of a Frasnian (Upper Devonian) Composite Standard, p. 177–184. In Mann, K. O. and Lane, H. R. (eds.), Graphic Correlation. SEPM Special Publication 53.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W., Philip, G. M., and Jackson, J. H. 1970. Revision of the Polygnathus varcus Group (Conodonten, Middle Devonian): Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Mh., 11:650–667.Google Scholar
Huddle, J. W., Feist, R., Becker, R. T., and House, M. R. 1994. Definition of the Frasnian-Famennian Stage boundary. Episodes, 16:433–441.Google Scholar
Lange, F. G. 1968. Conodonten-Gruppenfunde aus Kalken des tieferen Oberdevon. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 2:37–57.Google Scholar
McGhee, G. R. Jr. 1996. The Late Devonian Mass Extinction: The Frasnian-Famennian Crisis. Columbia University Press, New York, 303 p.Google Scholar
McLaren, D. J. 1989. Detection and significance of mass killings, p. 1–8. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14, Volume 3. [imprint 1988]Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., and Youngquist, W. 1947. Conodonts from the type section of the Sweetland Creek shale in Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 21:501–517.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1956. Zur Kenntnis der Conodonten-Fauna des europäischen Devons, 1. Die Gattung Palmatolepis. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 494, 70 p.Google Scholar
Müller, K. J. 1962. Zur systematischen Einteilung der Conodontophorida. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 36:109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, K. J., and Müller, E. M. 1957. Early Upper Devonian (Independence) conodonts from Iowa, Pt. 1. Journal of Paleontology, 31:1069–1108.Google Scholar
Over, D.J. 1990. Conodont Biostratigraphy of the Woodford Shale (Late Devonian-Early Carboniferous) in the Arbuckle Mountains, South-central Oklahoma. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 160 p.Google Scholar
Over, D.J. 1997. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Java Formation (Upper Devonian) and the Frasnian-Famennian boundary in western New York State, p. 161–177. In Klapper, G., Murphy, M. A., and Talent, J. A. (eds.), Paleozoic Sequence Stratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Biogeography: Studies in Honor of J. Granville (“Jess”) Johnson. Geological Society of America Special Paper 321.Google Scholar
Puchkov, V. N., Klapper, G., and Mashkova, T. V. 1981. Natural assemblages of Palmatolepis from the Upper Devonian of the northern Urals. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 26:281–298.Google Scholar
Racki, G. 1998. Frasnian-Famennian biotic crisis: undervalued tectonic control? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 141:177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, C. A. 1976. Conodont biofacies of late Devonian Polygnathus styriacus Zone in western United States, p. 171–186. In Barnes, C. R. (ed.), Conodont Paleoecology. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 15.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., and Dreesen, R. 1984. Late Devonian icriodontid biofacies models and alternate shallow-water conodont zonation, p. 143–178. In Clark, D. L. (ed.), Conodont Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, C. A., Ziegler, W., Dreesen, R., and Butler, J. L. 1988. Late Frasnian mass extinction: conodont event stratigraphy, global changes, and possible causes. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 102:263–307.Google Scholar
Sannemann, D. 1955. Beitrag zur Unterliederung des Oberdevons nach Conodonten. Nues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 100:324–331.Google Scholar
Savage, N. M. 1992. Late Devonian (Frasnian and Famennian) conodonts from the Wadleigh Limestone, southeastern Alaska. Journal of Paleontology, 66:277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schülke, I. 1995. Evolutive Prozesse bei Palmatolepis in der frühen Famenne-Stufe (Conodonta, Ober-Devon). Göttinger Arbeiten Zur Geologie und Paläontologie, 67, 108 p.Google Scholar
Schülke, I. 1996. Evolution of early Famennian ancyrognathids (Conodonta, Late Devonian). Geologica et Palaeontologica, 30:33–47.Google Scholar
Schülke, I. 1997. Conodont clusters and multielement reconstructions from the Upper Kellwasser horizon at La Serre (Late Frasnian, Montagne Noire, southern France). Geologica et Palaeontologica, 31:37–66.Google Scholar
Seddon, G. 1970. Frasnian conodonts from the Sadler Ridge-Bugle Gap area, Canning Basin, Western Australia. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 16:723–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1986. Phanerozoic overview of mass extincitons, p. 277–295. In Raup, D. M. and Jablonski, D., (eds.), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, C. R. 1938. Conodonts of the Olentangy Shale. Journal of Paleontology, 12:411–443.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. C. 1988. The Conodonta: Morphology, Taxonomy, Paleoecology, and Evolutionary History of a Long-Extinct Animal Phylum. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 212 p.Google Scholar
Tillman, J. R. 1970. The age, stratigraphic relationships, and correlation of the lower part of the Olentangy Shale of central Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 70:202–217.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Bassler, R. S. 1926. A classification of the toothlike fossils, conodonts, with description of American Devonian and Mississippian specimens. U.S. National Museum Proceedings, Volume 68, article 12, 63 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walliser, O. H. 1995. Global events in the Devonian and Carboniferous, p. 225–250. In Walliser, O.H. (ed.), Global Events and Event Stratigraphy in the Phanerozoic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wang, K., Geldsetzer, H. H. J., Goodfellow, W. D., and Krouse, H. R. 1996. Carbon and sulfur anomalies across the Frasnian-Famennian extinction boundary, Alberta, Canada. Geology, 24:187–191.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchell, N. H. 1874. The geology of Delaware County. Ohio Geological Survey, Volume 2, Pt. 1, p. 272–313.Google Scholar
Wittekindt, H. P. 1966. Zur Conodonten Chronologie des Mittledevons. Fortschrift Geologie Rheinland u. Westfalen, 9:621–646. [imprint 1965]Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1962. Taxionomie und Phylogenie oberdevonischer Conodonten und ihre stratigraphische Bedeutung. Abhandlungen des Hessischen Landesamtes für Bodenforschung, 38, 166 p.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1973a. Ancyrognathus , p. 45. In Ziegler, W. (ed.), Catalogue of Conodonts I. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W. 1973b. Palmatolepis , p. 265–270. In Ziegler, W. (ed.), Catalogue of Conodonts I. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ziegler, W., and Sandberg, C. A. 1990. The Late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation: Courier Forschunginstitut Senckenberg, 121, 115 p.Google Scholar